How removing duplicates from a Vec<T> where T: Eq + Hash?

Efficient Approaches

When T implements Eq + Hash (for equality checks and hashing), the optimal methods are:

1. Using HashSet (Preserves Order)

Steps:

1. Iterate through the Vec.
2. Track seen elements with a HashSet.
3. Collect only unseen elements.

Code:

use std::collections::HashSet;

fn dedup_ordered<T: Eq + std::hash::Hash + Clone>(vec: &mut Vec<T>) {
    let mut seen = HashSet::new();
    vec.retain(|x| seen.insert(x.clone()));
}

Example:

let mut vec = vec![1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3];
dedup_ordered(&mut vec);
assert_eq!(vec, [1, 2, 3]); // Order preserved

Performance:

• Time: O(n) (average case, assuming good hash distribution).
• Space: O(n) (for the HashSet).

2. Sort + Dedup (Destroys Order)

Steps:

1. Sort the Vec (groups duplicates together).
2. Remove consecutive duplicates with dedup().

Code:

fn dedup_unordered<T: Ord>(vec: &mut Vec<T>) {
    vec.sort();      // O(n log n)
    vec.dedup();     // O(n)
}

Example:

let mut vec = vec![3, 2, 2, 1, 3];
dedup_unordered(&mut vec);
assert_eq!(vec, [1, 2, 3]); // Order changed

Performance:

• Time: O(n log n) (dominated by sorting).
• Space: O(1) (in-place, no extra allocations).

Comparison

Method	Time Complexity	Space Complexity	Preserves Order?	Use Case
HashSet	O(n)	O(n)	✅ Yes	Order matters, no sorting allowed.
Sort + Dedup	O(n log n)	O(1)	❌ No	Order irrelevant, memory-constrained.

Key Takeaways

✅ Use HashSet if:

• Order must be preserved.
• You can tolerate O(n) space.

✅ Use Sort + Dedup if:

• Order doesn't matter.
• Memory is tight (e.g., embedded systems).

Alternatives:

• For no_std environments, use a BTreeSet (slower but avoids hashing).
• Use itertools::unique for iterator-based deduplication.

Try This: What happens if T is Clone but not Hash?

Answer: Use Vec::dedup_by with a custom equality check (no hashing).